I would
like to clear up a very important misunderstanding about a fairy tale. In the
tale of the emperor’s new clothes, a little boy calls out that the emperor is
naked and has no clothes on. In the classic fairy tale, the townspeople are
abashed, ashamed at their fear of the obvious truth that led them to their
error. They kicked the lying tailors out
of town and everyone was happy.
Let me
tell you the Israeli version of that story. The little boy says, “Hey, the
emperor has no clothes on”. Everyone sees that it is true, but fears the
repercussions. The boy is thrown in jail without a trial, and the media goes to
work, declaring that there is an extremist element bent on tearing the clothes
off the emperor.
I recently posted on Facebook
several posts. One was about soldiers in the IDF going to jail for saying they
wanted to kill terrorists. I was confused as to why they would be punished for
that. I thought it was their sworn duty to kill terrorists. I also posted
something saying that I wanted the killers of the three Israeli youths to be
brought to justice. I was chastised harshly, albeit by only a few people. I was
accused of promoting vigilantes and senseless violence. I was accused of calling for a Jewish Jihad when all I wanted was a normal legal process, an army that dealt with national existential threat and a police that reacted strongly to crime. I was accused of promoting genocide. I tried to explain
myself several times but was astounded at how unheard I was.
The
facts are that there may have been a murder of an Arab youth by Jews. There
were definitely three Jews murdered and their murderers have not been turned
over by the PA> The vast majority of the rioting has been by Arabs. For some
reason, the left-wing reacts far more strongly to the almost non-existent
right-wing Jewish violence than it does to the prevalent, even accepted, Arab
violence. The Jewish left is terrified of any reaction by the Jewish right.
I
am fascinated by this. Not reacting to the murder of three young boys is s
clear sign of mental sickness. Being more afraid of a potential danger than you
are of an actual threat that has struck countless times and has recently shed
blood is, by definition, delusional. As delusional and imbalanced as it is, it
is consistent with left wing mindset. Despite several wars against the Arab
nations, the left-wing preferred a peace pact with Yaaser Arafat as a solution
to battle an imaginary demographic threat that was imminent at some moment in
the future. Shimon Peres, the mastermind of Israel’s nuclear program, felt that
the atomic bomb changed the strategic reality to where we no longer need land
to ensure a military solution. For this approach, Shimon Peres was awarded the
Nobel Peace Prize.
But back
to my original; dilemma. The left and the media are screaming about the right
wing “fanatics” the “extremists” who are irrationally and irresponsibly
incensed of three murders.
So let
me try to explain the two positions, as I understand them, in one sentence
each.
Left-wing:
Potential threat is much greater than any threat we have already lived through.
Right-wing:
The left-wing has traded the rule of law for a packet of worthless promises.
Lawlessnes is the methodology of
the peace process. It means the government does not react in the manner of
normal governments. It allows the citizens to be killed and the murderers to be
set free. It means that a teen can call the police emergency number, announce that
he has been kidnapped, and gunshots are heard in the background, and the police
do not react. The prime minister declares a search for kidnapping victims,
knowing full well that the teens are already dead. It means that 13,000 people
can be made homeless for a political agenda that, a peace agreement that was
never intended to be signed by the absent partner. The rights of the homeowners
are pushed aside for a political agenda. Rockets fall on cities and there is
not even any lip service paid to finding a solution.
There is a reason for this. The
peace process began with Shimon Peres going to Cypress to meet with Yaaser
Arafat and getting him to sign a peace agreement. Interestingly enough, it was
entirely illegal for Shimon Peres to do that. For any person to meet with a
declared enemy of the state and to make agreements and work with them was
illegal, an offense for which many men have been executed or been sent to jail.
It is the dictionary definition of treason. When he returned to Israel with
said agreement, Yitzchak Rabin, Peres’ longstanding political enemy, was
required by law to put Shimon Peres in jail. Instead, he had the law changed
and made Shim Peres foreign minister. The peace process began with a perversion
of justice and has been characterized by such.
I am going to the trouble of
explaining this so that my left-wing friends can understand what the right wing
Jews are screaming for. We want a return to law. We want criminals with blood
on their hands to stay in jail. We want murderers to be hunted down and
punished. We want to buy a piece of land from the proper authorities and have
that sale honored. Throwing stones at a moving car, or at a person, should be
illegal, and not treated as inevitable. Israel has the highest rate of car
thefts in the world with over45,000 car thefts
each year and less than 5,000 of those cars being recovered. Rockets are fired into cities. That should be
treated as a crime. Tolerance is not a positive trait when displayed by the authorities
towards evil. The peace process has brought many bad things to Israel. One of
the worst is the perversion of law. I realize that this is only my opinion. If
you disagree then you are clearly wrong and in need of serious psychiatric
care. But like I said, that is only my opinion..
1 comment:
The problem we have is...if the Palestinian kid was killed by Jewish terrorists, then we no longer own the high ground. That means we can no longer, as a country, make retribution strikes against Hamas for doing the same thing we did. If that kid was killed by Jews, they did more harm to us than just taking a life.
Post a Comment